Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analyzes the effects of digital payment on marketing strategy and consumer purchase decisions in Bengkulu City using primary data from 100 respondents. The instrument contains 12 Likert-scale indicators forming three constructs: digital payment characteristics (X1), marketing strategy effectiveness (X2), and consumer purchase decision (Y). All indicators have corrected item-total correlations above 0.30, and all constructs are reliable (Cronbach’s alpha: X1=0.766; X2=0.828; Y=0.749). Regression results indicate that digital payment does not significantly predict marketing strategy (β=0.162; p=0.125), but positively and significantly predicts purchase decisions (β=0.439; p<0.001). Marketing strategy also positively predicts purchase decisions (β=0.264; p=0.006). In the simultaneous model, X1 and X2 explain 23.2% of the variance in purchase decisions. A 5,000-replication bootstrap estimates an indirect effect of approximately 0.033 with a 95% CI [-0.009, 0.101], providing no evidence of mediation. The findings suggest that digital-payment experience is directly associated with purchase decisions, while marketing strategy remains independently relevant

Keywords

digital payment; marketing strategy; consumer purchase decision; QRIS; Bengkulu City

Article Details

How to Cite
Susanto , D. E., Kurniawan , W., & Ariska , F. (2026). Digital Payment On Marketing Strategies And Consumer Purchase Decisions In Bengkulu City. Economics and Digital Business Review, 8(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.37531/ecotal.v8i1.4234

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Adriyanto, A. T., Utami, N. T., & Simamora, E. R. (2025). Optimizing the use of QRIS in the food stalls: Analysis of convenience and risk on purchasing decisions. The Asian Journal of Technology Management, 18(3), 182–212. https://doi.org/10.12695/ajtm.2025.18.3.2
  3. Bank Indonesia. (2025). Monetary Policy Report: Third Quarter 2025. https://www.bi.go.id/en/publikasi/laporan/Pages/Laporan-Kebijakan-Moneter-Triwulan-III-2025.aspx
  4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  5. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
  6. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.
  7. Paramita, E. D., & Cahyadi, E. R. (2024). The determinants of behavioral intention and use behavior of QRIS as digital payment method using extended UTAUT model. Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.17358/ijbe.10.1.132
  8. Safitri, A. R., & Ningrum, R. A. C. (2024). Does the digital payment system “QRIS” affect the purchasing behaviour of food and beverage products? Ilomata International Journal of Management, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.61194/ijjm.v5i4.1324
  9. Saripudin, Yuniarti, R., & Ernawati, D. (2023). Exploring the factors influencing the adoption of QRIS as a digital payment in Indonesia. The Journal of Management Theory and Practice, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.37231/jmtp.2023.4.1.322
  10. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  11. Wirabuana, C., Marbanie, R., Sensuse, D. I., Hidayat, D. S., & Purwaningsih, E. H. (2024). Perceptions of the use of Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) for payment and its impact on consumer behavior. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.21609/jsi.v20i2.1416
  12. Zalukhu, S., & Lattu, A. (2025). The influence of using the QRIS digital payment method on customer purchasing decisions. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(1), 445–454. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i1.3064